As Israel continues its military operation against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, President Donald Trump is weighing whether the United States should join the effort with targeted strikes. According to multiple sources familiar with internal discussions, Trump is considering limited actions—including potential use of bunker-buster bombs on facilities like Fordow—but remains deeply cautious about becoming entangled in a prolonged conflict. The administration’s primary challenge: how to neutralize Iranian nuclear capabilities without igniting a full-scale war.
During high-level meetings at the White House and Camp David, Trump has received input from defense leaders, including CENTCOM Commander Gen. Michael Kurilla, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Allies such as Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continue to urge U.S. involvement, while others, including GOP senators and international diplomats, warn of regional destabilization and Iranian retaliation—particularly through attacks on U.S. bases or the Strait of Hormuz. Former Trump ambassador to Israel David Friedman even suggested a swift, limited use of “MOAB” airstrikes to cripple Iran’s nuclear capabilities and exit quickly.
Trump has publicly stated that no final decision has been made. He maintains that his ultimate goal remains unchanged: “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.” While some officials argue that decisive strikes could be executed without deep military engagement, others fear any U.S. involvement would trigger years of asymmetric warfare. As Trump balances pressure from national security hawks and isolationist voices within his party, Pentagon contingency planning continues in the background for possible Iranian reprisals.
