New Policy Language Sparks Outcry, Followed by Reversal Reaffirming Ban on Hate Symbols
A recently leaked U.S. Coast Guard policy document described swastikas and nooses as “potentially divisive symbols,” a classification that triggered bipartisan criticism and public backlash due to the historical context and sensitivity of these symbols.
The initial policy draft, revealed in November 2025, softened the language from previous policies that labeled such symbols as unequivocal hate symbols linked to oppression, instead using the term “potentially divisive.” The document suggested commanders could investigate and potentially order removal of these symbols if they were harming unit morale or discipline.
Following immediate public and political outcry, including comments from Democratic Senator Jacky Rosen, the Coast Guard reversed course within hours, reissuing a firmer policy explicitly prohibiting swastikas, nooses, and any symbols co-opted by hate-based groups at any Coast Guard locations.
The updated policy reiterates the ban on the public display of divisive or hate symbols, aligning with broader Department of Homeland Security regulations and military branch standards.
Controversy stemmed from confusion about enforcement in private spaces such as family housing, which the earlier draft appeared to exempt. The new policy clarified that hate symbols are forbidden across all Coast Guard properties.
Officials insisted the revision was not a mere update but a new policy to prevent misinformation and emphasize zero tolerance for hate symbols.
The Coast Guard, part of the U.S. armed forces under DHS, has historically modeled its human resources policies on Pentagon directives, aiming to maintain cohesion and discipline among personnel.
The episode underscores the ongoing challenges in balancing free expression, historical awareness, and maintaining an inclusive, respectful military environment.
